Lesson 3 of 4 · Read a flare through different filters
Read a flare through different filters
6 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonInterpret SUIT’s published flare panels using wavelength, timing and relative brightness rather than display colour alone.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Read & understand
Keep the event date and publication date separate
SUIT aboard Aditya-L1 observed an X6.3-class flare on February 22, 2024. ISRO discussed the result on February 28, 2025, alongside a study by Soumya Roy and colleagues. The event happened in 2024; the later article date is not a second observation of the same flare.
The figure shows a locating panel above eight narrow-band views of a selected region. Those panels are instrument observations with scientific display palettes and annotations. Their colours are not what an unaided human eye would see. The original timestamps, filter labels and region boxes are part of the evidence and remain visible.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Different filters can peak at different times
The study explains that the lower panels show the region at the respective peak for each filter. They are therefore not eight simultaneous exposures. A row of pictures can hide that timing difference unless the reader checks the labels and the accompanying method.
Researchers compared ultraviolet observations with other instruments and found differences in the timing of some signal peaks. Such comparisons help investigate how an event appears in different measurements. They do not justify treating every displayed colour as a direct temperature or claiming that one image alone settles every mechanism of flare heating.
Published SUIT observations of the February 22, 2024 flare, reproduced in ISRO’s February 28, 2025 account of Roy et al. (2025). The upper panel locates the region; lower panels show the selected region in eight narrow-band filters at their respective peak times. Their display colours are not naked-eye solar colours. Original labels, timestamps, region boxes and arrows are retained; no new crop or colour processing was applied. Credit: SUIT team / IUCAA / DOS-ISRO; Roy et al. (2025). Complete published frame retained; delivery derivatives resized and compressed only.
Look closely
Do the eight lower filter panels show the same instant?
See what to notice
No. The source study selects each filter’s peak, and the retained timestamps differ. The display colours also represent scientific palettes, not naked-eye colours.
Check 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Calculate a change with a stated reference
In an original same-filter exercise, a corrected signal rises from a baseline of 200 units to 300 units. The increase is 100 units, which is 50 percent of the baseline. A second filter might use a different response or display scale, so its raw number cannot automatically be compared as if it measured the same quantity in the same units.
Before comparing a time series, check exposure, calibration, region selection and time stamps. In this exercise, those conditions are assumed comparable. The calculation teaches a relative change; it is not a reanalysis of the published SUIT flare data or a conversion from brightness to plasma temperature.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.