Lesson 2 of 3 · PSM and suborbital recovery
PSM: measure, descend and recover
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonConnect suborbital free fall with experiment timing and the recovery of a research payload.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
A recoverable suborbital platform
The Plataforma de Microgravidade, or PSM, supports experiments carried on a suborbital flight. On September 15, 2026, Operation Potiguar Phase 2 tested its recovery system using the VS-30 V16 from Barreira do Inferno. AEB reported a maximum altitude of 92 kilometers and about 12 minutes 30 seconds of total flight. The was retrieved at sea, completing a flight qualification of the recovery system.
The preserved photograph shows the VS-30 rising above the coastal launch area, with its exhaust plume extending toward the pad. The rocket supplies transport; the research platform carries the experiments. Those roles remain distinct even when both are part of one mission. The reported recovery milestone establishes an important capability, but the article does not supply a complete scientific analysis of every experiment carried on the flight.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Find the interval that answers the question
A suborbital mission includes powered ascent, a coast, descent and recovery. These phases do not provide the same acceleration environment. During useful , a payload and its contents move together, while residual disturbances can still matter. Total elapsed flight time therefore cannot be substituted for the duration of suitable experimental conditions. An experiment needs an acceleration record or another justified definition of when its observation window begins and ends.
Work through a fictional timing example. Suppose the usable window is 240 seconds, setup takes 30 seconds and a stabilization step takes another 20. The measurement can then run for 190 seconds: 240 minus 30 minus 20. A process requiring 210 seconds would not fit this sequence. The team would need to shorten preparation, change the experiment or use a different opportunity. These numbers illustrate planning and are not measurements from the PSM flight.
Budget the usable observation window
Original teaching diagram. Fictional window: 240 s. Setup: 30 s. Stabilization: 20 s. Measurement: 190 s. 210 s would not fit. Revise the experiment plan. These teaching values are not measured PSM performance; total flight time is a different quantity.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Budget the usable observation windowVS-30 V16 rises from Barreira do Inferno during the September 15, 2026 PSM recovery-system qualification flight. This is powered ascent; the later experimental interval and sea recovery are separate phases. The complete FAB photograph is preserved under the AEB page’s CC BY-ND 3.0 license.
Look closely
Where is the research platform in this mission sequence?
See what to notice
The rocket carries the platform during ascent. The photo supplies the launch setting; timing and acceleration measurements describe the subsequent experimental opportunity.
Check 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Bring information and material back
can send measurements during flight, while onboard storage can preserve a more detailed record for later retrieval. A returned specimen may also allow a laboratory measurement that an onboard instrument cannot perform. These are complementary paths to a result. A sensible fictional experiment might record temperature and acceleration alongside video, store the complete dataset aboard and transmit a smaller status stream to help the ground team monitor the run.
Recovery planning includes locating the payload, retrieving it and preserving its contents during handling. AEB’s account describes an aircraft and rescue-team operation at sea. For a scientific investigation, the handover record should continue from recovery to laboratory analysis so that storage conditions and delays are known. PSM illustrates why research platforms need both flight engineering and practical access to the material afterward. The flight, retrieval and interpretation each contribute a different part of the experimental chain.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: AEB: PSM recovery-system flight qualificationSeptember 16, 2026 report of the previous day’s VS-30 V16 flight and sea recovery. The reported 12 minutes 30 seconds is total flight time, not a measured microgravity interval.
- Read: NASA: why free fall produces microgravityUse the free-fall explanation; historical aircraft descriptions are not current fleet information.
- Read: NASA: choosing ways to study microgravityCompares ground, aircraft, rocket and orbital opportunities and explains the value of testing before orbital research.
- Read: NASA: system design processesCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.