Lesson 4 of 4 · PdQSat and spacecraft power
PdQSat: budget energy and test peak power
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonUse a university battery experiment to distinguish stored energy, delivery rate and validation conditions.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
A spacecraft for learning about energy storage
PdQSat is a UFMG experimental CubeSat project supported by AEB. Its name refers to pão de queijo, the cheese bread associated with Minas Gerais. UFMG describes planned flight experiments involving a lithium-sulfur battery and a , alongside training in space engineering. AEB’s 2025 report records completion of preliminary design and continued detailed development, with integration and environmental testing planned for 2026. Those records establish development work, not successful orbital validation.
A technology experiment asks a narrower question than whether every future spacecraft should use the device. It needs to specify the tested unit, load, temperature, measurement method and success criteria. The spacecraft must also remain able to operate and return the experiment’s data. A promising storage technology cannot be judged only by its name or a single headline comparison; the relevant performance depends on the task and test conditions.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Energy and power answer different questions
Energy is the amount available for work, while is the rate at which energy is transferred. A watt is a joule per second. In an original example, an ideal load drawing two watts for thirty minutes uses one , equivalent to 3,600 joules. That calculation ignores conversion losses and other loads so the distinction is clear. It is not a PdQSat battery capacity or an operating specification.
Now imagine a transmitter needing ten watts for six seconds. It uses sixty joules, much less total energy than the half-hour load, but demands a higher delivery rate during that short interval. A storage system can have enough energy and still fail to supply the required peak current or maintain voltage. Batteries and supercapacitors can serve different roles in a design; comparing them requires compatible conditions and both energy and power requirements.
Budget duration and delivery rate
Original teaching diagram. 2 watts for 30 minutes. 1 watt-hour = 3,600 joules. Long load: larger total energy. 10 watts for 6 seconds. 60 joules in the short pulse. Short load: higher peak power. Original ideal examples; actual budgets also include losses, other loads and reserve.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Budget duration and delivery rateNASA/JPL-Caltech photograph of one of the two completed PREFIRE CubeSats with arrays deployed. This is a comparison for solar generation, not PdQSat hardware or its storage experiment. The PREFIRE 2 archive card uses it as a representative image of the matched PREFIRE pair without identifying the exact unit.
Look closely
Can the visible solar arrays tell you the spacecraft’s battery capacity?
See what to notice
No. The image shows the arrangement of generating hardware; storage capacity and delivered power require electrical specifications and measurements.
Check 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Turn a promising component into an interpretable experiment
A useful test records voltage, current and temperature over time, identifies the load sequence and states how the device was charged. Repeating a cycle can reveal changes that a single successful pulse misses. Environmental tests can investigate behavior under specified temperatures and pressures, while later flight data would address an actual mission environment. These are complementary steps, and a planned flight experiment should remain a plan until its results are documented.
The accompanying PREFIRE photograph provides a comparison with a different spacecraft’s visible solar arrays. Solar generation and storage are connected but distinct: arrays gather energy in suitable illumination, while storage can supply loads when generation is insufficient. Their visible area alone cannot reveal battery capacity or guaranteed available power. For a final design exercise, list the average loads, short peaks, losses and reserve, then specify the measurements needed to verify each part of the energy budget.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: UFMG: PdQSat energy experimentsDescribes the experimental lithium-sulfur battery, supercapacitor and training aims. The lesson does not adopt the article’s ambiguous energy-density comparison.
- Read: AEB: 2025 management reportPDF page 52 reports Aldebaran integration and testing and PdQSat preliminary design. Forecasts in this year-end account are not proof of later flight outcomes.
- Read: NASA: what fits inside a CubeSatIntroduces the small volume shared by power, communications and instruments. This is general spacecraft context, not a specification for the Brazilian missions.