Lesson 4 of 7 · Phoenix meteorological station
Phoenix MET: watch the weather above a landing site
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonCombine surface readings and laser profiles without confusing snow aloft with snow on the ground.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
A weather station on another world
Phoenix landed in Mars’s northern polar region in May 2008. Canada contributed its meteorological station, known as MET. The station combined a vertical with temperature and pressure measurements; Danish collaborators supplied the wind telltale. These instruments described conditions at and above one landing site. The international contribution was part of a larger mission that also investigated the soil and subsurface ice.
The archive photograph shows Phoenix in its backshell during prelaunch processing in May 2007, while workers handle the removed heat shield behind it. This view helps locate the mission in its development history. It does not show the weather station operating on Mars, and the surrounding laboratory is not the polar landing site. The mission’s later observations provide the evidence for its weather discoveries.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
A vertical view adds information
Temperature and pressure near the lander describe local conditions. A lidar sends light upward and studies returning signals from particles and clouds, adding information about height. In September 2008, NASA reported that Phoenix detected snow falling from clouds about four kilometres above the site. In that observation the falling particles vaporized before reaching the ground, so snowfall aloft did not establish surface accumulation.
Consider an invented weather profile with particles detected at heights of four, three and two kilometres, but no matching falling-particle signal below one kilometre. The profile supports investigating what happened during descent. It does not justify drawing a snow-covered surface solely from the upper detections. Lower-altitude observations, surface images and temperature information can help evaluate the interpretation. A missing signal also has to be considered alongside the instrument’s sensitivity.
Keep snowfall aloft separate from accumulation
Original teaching diagram. ATMOSPHERIC EVIDENCE. Particles falling from clouds. Heights and times measured. SURFACE QUESTION. Did particles reach ground?. Check lower and surface data. Phoenix’s reported September 2008 snow vaporized before reaching the ground.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Keep snowfall aloft separate from accumulationPhoenix in its backshell at the Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility on 10 May 2007. Workers in the background handle the removed heat shield. This is prelaunch processing on Earth, before the meteorological station recorded weather on Mars.
Look closely
Which part of the mission does this photograph document?
See what to notice
Hardware preparation before launch. The atmospheric findings require the later Mars observations, not this laboratory photograph.
Check 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Use time as another coordinate
A weather reading has a time as well as a place. In a fictional comparison, the morning temperature is minus seventy degrees Celsius and the afternoon value is minus forty. The change is a warming of thirty degrees, even though both temperatures remain below zero Celsius. Comparing the values correctly is a first step; understanding the cause requires the time of day, seasonal context and other measurements.
Phoenix’s operations ended in 2008 as the northern seasonal environment became less favorable for its solar-powered mission. The resulting weather record remains a scientific dataset from that place and period. It is neither a current Mars forecast nor a description of the whole planet at every hour. Preserve those boundaries when comparing it with an orbiter’s regional observations or with measurements from another lander.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: CSA: Phoenix and its meteorological stationCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.
- Read: NASA JPL: September 2008 observations of falling snowCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.
- Read: NASA JPL: Phoenix ends its workCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.