Lesson 2 of 5 · Exomars
ExoMars: connect atmosphere, descent and subsurface science
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonDistinguish ExoMars mission elements, interpret an engineering failure and separate evidence for habitability from proof of life.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
Separate the program from its spacecraft
ExoMars investigates whether Mars has supported life through complementary measurements. The 2016 mission carried the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter and Schiaparelli entry, descent and landing demonstrator. The orbiter reached Mars orbit, while Schiaparelli failed to land safely. Giving the entire program one success-or-failure label would conceal these different outcomes and the evidence each element returned.
The orbiter investigates trace atmospheric gases and provides communications relay capability. A detected gas can have more than one possible source, including geological and biological processes. Its abundance, location, variation and measurement uncertainty matter. A non-detection also has an instrument limit and observing context; it does not automatically prove that the substance is absent everywhere on Mars.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Use telemetry to reconstruct a failure
During Schiaparelli’s descent, unexpected rotation exceeded the inertial measurement unit’s measurement range. The resulting attitude-estimation error, combined with radar data, led the onboard system to calculate an impossible position below the surface. It released the parachute too soon and ended braking prematurely. The lander crashed, even though earlier entry stages and data collection had worked.
Relayed telemetry allowed investigators to reconstruct this chain. The engineering lesson concerns how sensors, models, software and validation interact, rather than simply blaming a parachute or declaring all data useless. In a fictional descent review, test the response to saturated measurements and inconsistent estimates, not just whether each sensor works in its normal range.
ExoMars: distinguish outcomes
Original teaching diagram. 2016 flight. Orbiter reached Mars orbit. Lander did not land safely. Rosalind Franklin rover. Redesigned surface mission. Future launch target. A program combines different elements; a plan is not an achieved milestone.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: ExoMars: distinguish outcomesCheck 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Track a changed partnership and a future rover
The 2016 mission belonged to an ESA–Roscosmos partnership. After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, ESA suspended the planned rover launch in March 2022 and ended that rover-mission cooperation in July. The redesigned Rosalind Franklin mission requires a European landing system and renewed international contributions, including NASA’s involvement. Those changes do not erase the earlier orbiter’s history.
The rover is designed to drill beneath the radiation-exposed surface and analyze samples in context. As described in ESA’s planning material, its launch target is 2028; that is a plan, not a completed landing. Even an organic molecule is not by itself proof of biology. Compare chemical evidence, environmental history, contamination controls and alternative explanations before making a life claim.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: ESA: ExoMars factsheetThe rover remains a planned mission; a target launch year is not an achieved milestone.
- Read: ESA: completed Schiaparelli landing investigationUse the 2017 investigation findings, not the article’s superseded rover launch forecast.
- Read: ESA: redesigning the Rosalind Franklin missionCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.