Lesson 2 of 5 · Lunar Precursor Robotic Program
Lunar precursors: prepare exploration with different experiments
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonExplain how LRO and LCROSS served the Lunar Precursor Robotic Program through complementary investigations, and interpret the scope of LCROSS’s water evidence.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
Give a shared launch two different scientific jobs
NASA’s Lunar Precursor Robotic Program used robotic investigations to support lunar exploration. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and LCROSS launched together in June 2009, but sharing a launch did not make them one spacecraft. LRO entered lunar orbit for repeated measurements. LCROSS was designed around a targeted impact experiment. Their trajectories, operating durations and evidence products were different parts of a coordinated effort.
The precursor idea is to reduce uncertainty before choosing how and where to explore. Maps of terrain, illumination, temperature and radiation can inform engineering and scientific decisions. An experiment investigating material in a shadowed crater answers another part of the planning problem. Neither the word precursor nor a successful launch guarantees that all hazards and resource questions have already been resolved.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Follow the impact experiment in the correct order
LCROSS guided the spent Centaur upper stage toward Cabeus crater near the lunar south pole. In October 2009, the stage struck a permanently shadowed region. The following shepherding spacecraft observed the resulting and transmitted measurements before its own impact. The stage provided the initial impact, while the observing spacecraft collected evidence from the material released. Confusing those roles loses the logic of the experiment.
Spectroscopic observations and supporting measurements established that water was present in the excavated material. This is stronger than merely assuming that every cold dark region contains accessible ice. It is also a local result: the impact sampled particular material at a particular place. The detection does not by itself establish the water content of every crater or the feasibility of extracting a useful supply for a crew.
Two investigations, one exploration context
Original teaching diagram. LRO. Repeated orbital measurements. Terrain and environment. LCROSS. Targeted impact and plume. Evidence from excavated material. A local detection and a regional resource map answer different questions.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Two investigations, one exploration contextCheck 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Turn a detection into better follow-up questions
Suppose a fictional impact experiment detects a volatile substance at one site. A follow-up investigation might ask how its abundance varies nearby, how deeply it is buried and how it is mixed with other material. An engineering study would additionally need energy, access and processing requirements. Detection, mapping and practical resource use are related steps, but one does not automatically complete the others.
The LRO and LCROSS partnership illustrates how observations can support one another without becoming interchangeable. Orbital maps supply geographic and environmental context, while a targeted experiment tests a more specific question about material. A responsible exploration plan combines these forms of evidence and keeps their uncertainties visible. The useful outcome is a better constrained decision, rather than a blanket claim that the entire lunar south pole is fully understood.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: NASA: LRO and LCROSS within the Lunar Precursor Robotic ProgramCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.
- Read: NASA: LCROSS impact experiment and resultsCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.
- Read: NASA: the Cabeus impact site and detected volatilesCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.