Lesson 2 of 4 · Proximity and sampling
Plan the encounter and sample chain
6 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonExplain why proximity flight, site assessment and complementary samplers are linked stages of a sample-return mission.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Read & understand
Approach a moon within a planetary system
MMX’s planned quasi-satellite operations keep it near Phobos while it follows a related orbit around Mars. This is not adequately described as a simple isolated orbit around a small spherical moon. Mars, Phobos and the spacecraft all matter to the relative motion. Reconnaissance must establish useful viewing geometry and identify candidate sampling terrain before descent.
A helpful comparison is two runners following nearby lanes. One runner can remain near the other because their motion is coordinated, even though both travel around the track. The comparison is limited: spacecraft motion follows gravity and maneuver planning, not painted lanes. It illustrates why a view that seems to circle a nearby object does not, by itself, identify the underlying orbit.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Choose a site for science and safe access
Phobos is the sampling destination; Deimos is an observation target. A site can be scientifically interesting yet unsuitable for contact. Terrain, approach geometry and the ability to collect useful material all enter the choice. The planned sequence puts rover observations before the main spacecraft’s sampling operations, so local evidence can inform later decisions.
Consider an original site-selection exercise. Site A has unusual spectral contrast but poorly constrained obstacles. Site B has well-mapped terrain and less unusual contrast. Neither label alone selects the landing site. Ask whether further reconnaissance can reduce Site A’s uncertainty and whether Site B still addresses the science question. A good decision explains its evidence, constraints and remaining uncertainty rather than equating novelty with suitability.
Keep reserved and working material separate
Original proportional mass-budget exercise, not MMX allocation policy. The reserved material is separate from the working remainder.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Keep reserved and working material separateCheck 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Use two collection methods, then preserve context
The C-sampler is designed to obtain material below the immediate surface. The NASA-provided P-sampler uses a nitrogen-gas pulse to collect surface material. Their complementary sampling depths can help investigate a surface modified by space exposure and impacts. Collection must be followed by secure storage and an eventual Earth return; scooping material is only one step.
As an invented bookkeeping exercise, imagine a 10-gram teaching sample. Reserving 60 percent untouched leaves 4 grams for initial work. Six analyses needing 0.2 gram each use 1.2 grams, leaving 2.8 grams of that working allocation. These are classroom values, not MMX’s allocation policy. Keeping mass, identifiers and handling history with each portion protects the meaning of later measurements.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.