Lesson 1 of 4 · Start with the payload and orbit
Start with the payload and orbit
6 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonExplain the need for PSLV and assess payload mass, geometry and destination together.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Read & understand
Build access to useful orbits
India developed the Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle, or PSLV, to provide a launch capability closely associated with Earth-observation satellites. Its first flight in September 1993 was unsuccessful; the October 1994 development flight succeeded. Later missions carried varied Indian and international payloads. This history concerns a continuing launch family, not one rocket repeatedly refueled and flown.
A launch requirement needs more than “reach space.” The spacecraft needs a suitable orbit and a controlled release. Altitude, orbital plane, payload mass and the permitted launch period all influence the mission. An Earth-imaging project and a navigation project need not require the same delivery conditions even when they use the same launcher family.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Connect a program to the people doing the work
ISRO’s launcher overview assigns vehicle design and development to Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre. Liquid Propulsion Systems Centre and ISRO Propulsion Complex develop liquid and cryogenic propulsion capabilities, while Satish Dhawan Space Centre supports launch integration. These are complementary responsibilities; a vehicle is a coordinated system rather than the product of a single engine team.
Payload organizations bring their own requirements. PSLV-C28 carried three SSTL-built DMC3 optical-imaging spacecraft and two smaller British payloads in July 2015. DMC3-1 belongs to that group. Their commercial arrangement involved DMC International Imaging and Antrix. Foreign payload participation does not change the Indian attribution of the launch program.
DMC3 payloads during PSLV-C28 integration. Open fairing halves expose the accommodation; the numbered bodies cannot be distinguished in this frame. Department of Space / ISRO; accurate acknowledged reproduction under its website permission. No additional crop.
Look closely
What constraint does this image illustrate beyond total payload mass?
See what to notice
Spacecraft need physical clearance, mounting interfaces and safe release paths. The picture illustrates geometry, not qualification test results.
Check 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Mass is only one accommodation constraint
ISRO describes specially designed adapters for the three tall DMC3 spacecraft. The preserved integration photograph shows spacecraft inside opened fairing halves; it does not identify the numbered satellite in each position. The image helps explain why clearances, structural attachment and release paths matter alongside kilograms.
In an original planning example, a candidate payload meets a mission’s mass limit but is wider than the allowed envelope. That is not a ready-to-fly configuration. Engineers must change the payload or the qualified accommodation, then check loads, clearances and separation again. A spare mass allowance cannot make two physical objects fit through each other.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.