Lesson 4 of 5 · SESAT and shared capacity
SESAT: separate a spacecraft from the capacity sold on it
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonTrace international production and distinguish physical hardware from commercial service names.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
An international spacecraft project
SESAT launched from Baikonur in April 2000 for Eutelsat. Reshetnev’s history records development beginning in 1995 with French Alcatel participation. NASA’s launch bulletin describes a communications spacecraft with eighteen Ku-band transponders. The archive card uses the title Sesat. The project connects Russian spacecraft manufacturing with a European operator and a cross-border payload partnership.
The operator’s 2005–06 report describes SESAT 1 serving communications at 36° East, with coverage linking Europe and regions farther east and south. This is a dated service description. It should not be treated as the satellite’s position throughout its entire history. A spacecraft can be relocated or replaced at a service position without becoming a new physical object.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
The service name need not be another satellite
Eutelsat also marketed capacity under the name SESAT 2. Its operating reports distinguish this from SESAT 1: the later service used on an RSCC spacecraft. A customer might buy access through one operator while the hardware belonged to another. Counting every marketed name as a separately owned satellite would therefore inflate the physical fleet.
Imagine a hypothetical spacecraft with twenty-four comparable capacity units. Operator A leases twelve and operator B uses the other twelve. There are two service allocations but still one spacecraft. If either operator gives its allocation a new commercial name, the number of satellites does not increase. This simplified example is about identity and allocation, not the detailed performance of a particular transponder.
Count hardware and allocations separately
Original teaching diagram. One physical spacecraft. 24 comparable units. Stable spacecraft identity. Two service allocations. Operator A: 12 units. Operator B: 12 units. Two named services can share one spacecraft; count each kind of entity separately.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Count hardware and allocations separatelyCheck 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Follow continuity through a changing fleet
Eutelsat’s 2011 partnership announcement records that W7 replaced SESAT 1 at 36° East in January 2010. Its 2014–15 report separately describes replacing the SESAT 2 lease with capacity on Express-AM6. These are distinct changes: replacing an orbital service role and replacing a leased allocation. Neither should be collapsed into a story of two identical spacecraft being exchanged.
To follow a customer service over time, record the spacecraft identifier, owner, operating organization, allocated capacity and date. Each answers a different question. A user may experience continuity while the physical satellite changes, or retain the same satellite while the provider’s branding changes. SESAT shows why a connected archive needs relationships between programmes, hardware and services rather than a simple list of names.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: NASA SPACEWARN 558: SESATApril 2000 launch record and intended communications services; compare early announcements with later operator records.
- Read: Reshetnev: programme historyFollow the manufacturer’s accounts of Potok, SESAT cooperation and the experimental Zeya mission.
- Read: Eutelsat: 2005–06 operating reportSections on SESAT 1 and leased third-party capacity distinguish a physical spacecraft from a marketed communications allocation.
- Read: Eutelsat and RSCC: 2011 cooperation announcementHistorical account of French–Russian manufacturing cooperation and replacement of SESAT 1 at 36° East.
- Read: Eutelsat: 2014–15 resultsThe operator describes replacing leased SESAT 2 capacity with a new allocation on Express-AM6; a service name need not identify a separately owned satellite.