Lesson 1 of 3 · SPEQS and SpooQy experiments
SpooQy: bring a quantum experiment into orbit
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonDistinguish an onboard quantum experiment from a communications link to the ground.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
Make the instrument small enough to fly
Singapore’s Centre for Quantum Technologies at NUS developed a sequence of compact experiments with international collaborators. The earlier SPEQS instrument flew on Galassia and produced pairs of photons with correlated properties. That precursor tested components and measurement methods in space. Correlation by itself was not the same result as the later demonstration of ; each stage answered a more demanding experimental question.
SpooQy-1 extended that work in a small CubeSat. It travelled to the International Space Station in April 2019 and was released into its own orbit on June 17. Its source and detectors operated together aboard the spacecraft. Published results in 2020 established the production of entangled photon pairs there. The mission did not attempt to transmit those quantum signals to Earth, so its achievement concerns the onboard instrument.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Follow what is measured
A photon is a quantum of light. describes a property that optical components can prepare and measure. For paired photons, researchers compare measurement outcomes across chosen settings. Entanglement is established through the appropriate statistical experiment, rather than by looking at a photograph of the satellite or merely noticing that two ordinary measurements sometimes agree. Instrument behavior must be characterized so that the reported conclusion matches the measurements.
Imagine a fictional instrument that registers two thousand paired detections in one run and one thousand in another. Those totals alone do not establish that the second experiment has lost entanglement. Collection time, detector response, operating settings and the pattern of correlations could differ. The example illustrates why a count and an interpretation are separate: the scientific question determines which data and comparisons the experiment must retain.
Three different kinds of evidence
Original teaching diagram. Deployment photograph. Onboard measurement data. Ground-received photons. Where hardware was released. How the experiment behaved. Whether an optical link worked. One milestone cannot substitute for evidence of the next.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Three different kinds of evidenceSpooQy-1 moves away from Kibo on June 17, 2019, beside the station’s large solar arrays. NASA frame ISS059E104368 records the deployment. It does not show the photon measurements taking place inside the spacecraft.
Look closely
What evidence would establish the onboard experiment’s result?
See what to notice
The measurement records and statistical analysis establish the quantum result. This photograph establishes visible deployment context and scale.
Check 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Connect the experiment to the spacecraft
A compact payload has to fit within limits on mass, electrical power and thermal conditions. Engineers must also maintain optical alignment after launch stresses. The spacecraft then supplies power, runs commands and sends measurement records to the research team. A working radio channel can carry those records without carrying the original quantum states. Receiving a report about an experiment is different from receiving its photons.
NASA’s deployment photograph shows the small spacecraft beside the station’s much larger solar arrays. It gives a sense of the physical scale but cannot reveal the quantum measurement inside. Together, the photograph and experimental records tell complementary parts of the story. SpooQy provides an instrument demonstration that later missions can build on, while leaving the additional work of pointing at distant receivers and testing a complete communications link.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: CQT: the SPEQS experiment, 2016The Galassia instrument produced correlated photon pairs; the report distinguishes that precursor from entanglement.
- Read: CQT: SpooQy-1 results, 2020Confirms onboard entanglement and June 17, 2019 deployment. It explicitly says quantum signals were not sent to Earth.
- Read: NIST: quantum cryptographyExplains photons, shared keys, authentication and the role of quantum methods in protecting information.
- Read: NASA: product realizationCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.