Lesson 2 of 4 · Raavana-1
Raavana-1: ask what an experiment actually tested
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonExplain the scope of an onboard radio test and the tradeoff between image size and data volume.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
One spacecraft in a shared deployment
Raavana-1 was a 1U CubeSat developed through ACCIMT and Kyushu Institute of Technology as part of BIRDS-3. JAXA records its deployment from the International Space Station on 17 June 2019 alongside Japan’s Uguisu and Nepal’s NepaliSat-1. The photograph shows that three-spacecraft group separating near the station. Their common deployment does not make them a single satellite or imply identical national contributions.
ACCIMT’s early operations account reports received beacons, commands and downloaded data. Its later technical account describes imaging, attitude-control experiments, configurable electrical connections and an onboard LoRa demonstration. These represent different kinds of evidence: hearing a beacon establishes a communications event, while evaluating a payload requires its own data and interpretation. A milestone should be connected to the particular subsystem or experiment it demonstrates.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
A successful onboard link is not a complete communications service
The LoRa demonstration placed a transmitter and receiver inside the spacecraft, connected through an that reduced the signal. The experiment monitored received packets, current and temperature; it did not radiate that test signal to a ground sensor. Testing modules in orbit can reveal their behavior in the space environment, but this arrangement does not measure an end-to-end path from Earth to the satellite.
Consider an invented test in which two connected modules exchange 1,000 packets without a detected error. That supports the performance of that setup during the observed interval. It does not establish how antennas, atmospheric effects, interference, changing distance or ground equipment would affect a different link. A carefully limited success can be valuable. The mistake is extending the conclusion beyond the experiment’s tested conditions.
Two smaller dimensions multiply
Original teaching diagram. INVENTED RAW RGB. 640 × 480 × 3 bytes. 921,600 bytes. HALF WIDTH AND HEIGHT. 320 × 240 × 3 bytes. 230,400 bytes: one quarter. Compression and transmission overhead change actual file and downlink sizes.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Two smaller dimensions multiplyRaavana-1, Uguisu and NepaliSat-1 after deployment on 17 June 2019. NASA identifies the three-spacecraft group, but does not assign a name to each visible position.
Look closely
Can this photograph tell you which of the three CubeSats is Raavana-1?
See what to notice
The source identifies the group but does not label the individual positions. The photo supports the shared deployment context, not a guessed position for each spacecraft.
Check 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
A camera and a downlink share the same data budget
Raavana-1’s technical account describes reducing image dimensions for a constrained downlink. To see why dimensions matter, consider uncompressed RGB images with three bytes per pixel and no overhead. A 640-by-480 image contains 307,200 pixels and requires 921,600 bytes. A 320-by-240 version contains 76,800 pixels and requires 230,400 bytes: one quarter as much, because both dimensions were halved.
Those arithmetic examples are not reported file sizes from Raavana-1. Compression, packet headers and retransmissions change actual transfer requirements. Reducing dimensions can shorten a transfer while removing small details needed for some interpretations. Choose the image product according to the objective, then check what the returned data can support. ACCIMT records Raavana-1’s reentry on 3 October 2021; preserved and engineering knowledge remain useful after the spacecraft’s orbital life ends.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: JAXA: BIRDS-3 deployment on 17 June 2019The main account and explicit BIRDS-3 paragraph establish the mission; a stray second-round phrase in the footnote is inconsistent.
- Read: ACCIMT: Raavana-1 deployment and early ground operationsDated mission account describes initial signals, commanding and data return through Sri Lankan and Japanese ground stations.
- Read: ACCIMT: Raavana-1 systems and orbital resultsThe LoRa experiment linked modules inside the spacecraft; it was not a ground-to-orbit LoRa service. The page inconsistently counts payload groups and labels the deployment facility, so those claims are not repeated.
- Read: NASA: BIRDS-3 deployment photograph, 17 June 2019NASA metadata identifies the three-spacecraft group as Uguisu, Raavana-1 and NepaliSat-1. The caption does not assign names to individual positions in the image.