Lesson 6 of 6 · Planning landing and sample return
Plan the whole chain to a returned sample
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonTrace the dependencies from approach and surface work to recovery and scientific curation.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
Landing adds a local world to the problem
A landing plan must connect the interplanetary arrival with conditions close to the surface. Terrain, lighting, atmosphere if present, navigation uncertainty and communication all affect the design. A site can be scientifically attractive yet difficult to reach or operate from. Choosing it involves more than placing a marker on a global map.
Sample collection adds another requirement: material must enter the intended container in a useful amount and condition. Contact with the surface is not proof that a sample was collected. Appropriate observations and system evidence must establish the result before the mission relies on it for the return journey.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Return is a chain of different systems
A sample-return architecture may involve surface departure, rendezvous, a cruise back to Earth and a separate entry capsule. The exact chain depends on the mission. Each handoff has interfaces and evidence requirements. A working outbound spacecraft cannot compensate for an absent means of leaving the target or protecting the sample during return.
OSIRIS-REx returned its Bennu sample capsule to Earth on September 24, 2023. NASA’s recovery account describes moving the capsule into a temporary clean room. This illustrates how the scientific chain continues after landing: recovery and controlled handling connect a successful flight with material that laboratories can interpret.
Hayabusa reenters over Australia in June 2010. The atmospheric light traces a return event; it does not by itself establish which material was later recovered or how the sample was handled. Recovery and curation records complete that scientific chain.
Look closely
Which claim needs evidence beyond the bright reentry trail?
See what to notice
The identity, condition and handling history of recovered sample material require recovery and laboratory documentation. An atmospheric image alone cannot establish those outcomes.
Check 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Preserve what the material can tell us
Contamination can complicate the distinction between extraterrestrial material and substances introduced by the mission or terrestrial handling. Documentation of containers, collection conditions and processing history helps researchers evaluate that distinction. preserves samples and their context for present and future investigations.
For a fictional proposal, draw six boxes: approach, collection, confirmation, return, recovery and curation. For each box, name what must arrive from the previous stage and what evidence it passes to the next. If one box only says “then bring it home,” the design still hides a major part of the mission. The goal is an interpretable sample, not merely a dramatic landing image.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: NASA: OSIRIS-REx sample recovery on September 24, 2023Compare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.
- Read: NASA: encounter operationsUse the operational principles in this historical training text. Dated vehicle descriptions and forecasts are not a statement of current mission status.