Lesson 4 of 6 · Ocean Surface Topography Mission
OSTM: connect ocean research with an observing service
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonIdentify OSTM as Jason-2 and explain how scientific measurement, operational delivery and mission closure fit together.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
Recognize two names for one mission
The Ocean Surface Topography Mission, abbreviated OSTM, is also known as Jason-2. It launched in June 2008 as a partnership among NASA, France’s CNES, NOAA and EUMETSAT. The names describe the same mission, not two independent satellites whose measurements can be counted as separate evidence. It continued the sea-surface-height observing lineage established by TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-1.
The partnership joined research and operational responsibilities. Ocean-height measurements support scientific questions about circulation and climate, while timely data can also support forecasting and practical ocean services. A research-quality archive and a prompt operational product may use related observations but have different delivery and processing requirements. Their labels help users choose the appropriate evidence for a task.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Account for the full measurement chain
An altimeter supplies radar range measurements; other instruments and tracking systems help correct and locate them. Atmospheric water vapor affects radar propagation, so a microwave radiometer supports a necessary correction. Orbit determination also matters: an error in the satellite’s estimated position can appear as an error in the ocean surface. Calibration work links these parts of the system.
For a fictional example, suppose the uncorrected processing introduces a 3-centimeter height error. Simply averaging many observations does not guarantee that a persistent bias will vanish. Random scatter and a consistent offset behave differently. Identifying the cause and applying a justified correction is more useful than presenting extra decimal places in an otherwise biased result.
Quality and delivery are separate requirements
Original teaching diagram. SCIENTIFIC QUALITY. Range and orbit knowledge. Calibrated corrections. SERVICE DELIVERY. Ground and processing chain. Useful arrival time. One mission can support several products with different processing and delivery needs.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Quality and delivery are separate requirementsCheck 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Plan for both continuity and closure
Jason-2 continued collecting useful observations beyond its original mission design life. Its science mission ended on October 1, 2019 after deterioration in the spacecraft’s power system. That completed record is different from the still-useful data archive. The end of one spacecraft’s operations also makes continuity planning and overlap with successors especially valuable.
Suppose a service promises a daily ocean product. It must consider satellite health, ground contact, processing and delivery deadlines, along with the quality of the measurements. A perfect observation arriving too late can fail that particular service requirement. OSTM shows why a space program includes partner roles, instruments, data systems and responsible end-of-mission decisions, rather than only the satellite visible in a launch photograph.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: NASA: OSTM/Jason-2 mission completion and partnersCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.
- Read: JPL: Jason-2 instruments and mission milestonesThe page’s sentence assigning a 1992 start to Jason-1 is erroneous: TOPEX/Poseidon began the 1992 record; Jason-1 launched in 2001. Use the dated mission histories.
- Read: NASA: Jason-3 and Jason-2 cross-calibrationA dated February 2016 account of the tandem observing phase, not a claim about present-day orbit assignments.