Lesson 3 of 8 · MIRAX and coded-mask astronomy
MIRAX: make an image from shadows
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonDescribe coded-mask imaging and how a balloon prototype can develop parts of a space observatory.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
A Brazilian view of the energetic sky
MIRAX, the Monitor e Imageador de Raios X, was conceived to investigate the changing high-energy sky, including the region toward the Galactic center. The mission team’s early papers describe a wide-field X-ray monitoring concept. INPE’s October 2026 catalog says the project is undergoing reconsideration and resizing. Historical instrument configurations and forecast launch dates should therefore be read as stages in a design history, not as a description of an observatory already operating in orbit.
High-energy photons can reveal hot gas and energetic processes around compact objects. A detector records interactions, however, rather than automatically producing a recognizable photograph of a star field. To identify where the photons came from, an instrument needs a way to encode direction and a model that connects its measurements to the sky. Different energy ranges and science goals lead to different instrument designs.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Use a coded pattern to infer direction
A coded-mask instrument places a pattern of open and blocking elements above a detector plane. Incoming radiation casts a pattern whose position depends on direction. Analysis compares the recorded pattern with the response expected for possible sources. The detector image and the reconstructed sky map are different products. A bright patch in raw detector counts is not automatically a bright object at the same location in the sky.
Imagine a simplified teaching model with a patterned screen and a row of light-sensitive cells. Moving a distant lamp sideways shifts the screen’s shadow. Two lamps contribute overlapping patterns, making interpretation more difficult. This visible-light analogy illustrates encoding, not the material properties or exact performance of a hard-X-ray telescope. Real analysis must also account for background, detector sensitivity and uncertainty rather than merely matching one attractive pattern.
Decode the observation
Original teaching diagram. Sky sources and background. Patterned mask. Detector event map. Calibrated instrument response. Reconstruct source directions. Check uncertainty and residuals. protoMIRAX is a balloon prototype; INTEGRAL is a separately labeled photographic comparison.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Decode the observationComparison photograph: the INTEGRAL flight model with extended solar arrays at ESTEC in February 2002. This is a separate European high-energy observatory, not MIRAX or protoMIRAX. The complete ESA photograph is preserved locally. Related archive: INTEGRAL documented science outcome.
Look closely
Which visible systems support a scientific observatory beyond its detector?
See what to notice
The extended arrays and spacecraft structure illustrate power and mechanical support. Their appearance does not establish MIRAX’s instrument design or flight status.
Check 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
What a pathfinder can establish
The protoMIRAX experiment developed a balloon-borne coded-aperture telescope and associated pointing, data-handling and ground systems. Its value lies in developing and checking parts of the measurement chain. A balloon environment differs from orbit, so a prototype cannot by itself qualify every spacecraft function. The science objective, detector response, environmental background and operating conditions must remain connected when interpreting a test.
The accompanying photograph shows the separate European INTEGRAL observatory during ground preparation, with its solar arrays extended. It is a comparison with real high-energy observatory hardware, not a picture of MIRAX or protoMIRAX. Use it to consider the support systems around a scientific payload: power, structure, communication and pointing. The Brazilian design history then shows how an instrument concept and its supporting systems can evolve before an orbital mission is realized.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: Braga and colleagues: MIRAX mission conceptA primary mission-team paper describing the 2003 concept, not a current flight configuration.
- Read: Braga and colleagues: the protoMIRAX experimentPrimary account of the balloon-borne coded-aperture prototype and its instrument systems.
- Read: INPE: October 2026 program and project catalogEQUARS appears on PDF page 223 and nanoMIRAX on pages 241–242. Intended products and future work must be distinguished from completed engineering models.
- Read: NASA: product realizationCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.