Lesson 6 of 6 · Choose a target that can answer the question
Choose a target that can answer the question
10 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonBuild a sampling plan around discriminating evidence, access, and preserved geological context.
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Start with the uncertainty you want to reduce
A new lunar destination is not scientifically valuable merely because it is new. Begin with a question: when did a basin form, how did the earliest crust differentiate, how long did volcanism continue, or where did polar volatiles originate? These questions require different materials and measurements. A photograph of dramatic terrain may motivate exploration, but it cannot replace an explicit link between target and hypothesis.
For impact chronology, researchers may seek melt that can be associated with the basin-forming event. For volcanic history, a documented lava unit and appropriate minerals for dating are more direct targets. For early crustal evolution, an old highland exposure may be valuable. An ice investigation needs knowledge of thermal conditions and contamination. No single rock or instrument provides an equally strong answer to every one of these questions.
Combine the orbital map with the local scene
Orbital images, spectra, and topography help identify candidate units and their relationships. Local observations reveal obstacles, textures, mixing, and practical access. The Chang'e 4 / Yutu-2 photograph shows the rover and its tracks within a cropped landing-site panorama. It supplies a real example of local terrain context, not a chemical map or a guarantee that a distant slope is safely traversable.
A route must also fit power, communications, time, and thermal constraints. Far-side operations need an appropriate communications arrangement because Earth is ordinarily hidden below the horizon there. Science planning and operations therefore interact: the most diagnostic outcrop is unhelpful if it cannot be reached or measured. Document the limitations so that a feasible substitute can be judged against the original question instead of selected only for visual appeal.
Yutu-2 and its tracks in a crop from the Chang’e-4 landing-site panorama on the lunar far side. The panorama provides local terrain context; its brightness and the rover’s tracks do not by themselves identify mineral composition or date the surface.
Look closely
What does the local view add to an orbital target map, and what remains uncertain?
See what to notice
Visible slopes, obstacles, surface texture, and the traveled path help plan nearby investigation. Composition, precise ages, ground scale, and conditions outside this view still require other observations and mission information.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Work through a decision
Work the evidence: spend three sample stops
Consider a fictional mission trying to date a specific basin-forming impact, with three accessible sample stops. Mapping identifies exposed melt plausibly linked to that basin, older highland fragments incorporated into it, and a lava unit that later covers part of the deposit. Sampling all three provides material to test the event assignment and its ordering. Spending every stop on similar loose boulders of unknown source would supply less independent context.
Suppose suitable analyses then date the melt to 3.9 ago and the covering lava to 3.5 billion years ago, consistent with their mapped order. The lava is younger by 0.4 billion years, or 400 million years. It constrains later ; it does not move the basin impact to 3.5 billion years ago. Repeated analyses and samples from additional exposures would test whether the inferred melt actually represents the intended event.
Check 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Design the record that future researchers will need
Before collecting, decide how to document the site, separate materials, preserve orientation when useful, and track handling. For a volatile investigation, heating or contamination can change the evidence being sought. Include appropriate blanks or reference materials and measurements of collection conditions. Returning more mass without retaining these records may increase the collection while leaving the central scientific uncertainty unresolved.
A strong plan also states which result would change its interpretation. If several supposed basin melts yield unrelated histories or transported origins, the geological correlation needs revision. If a younger flow is found beneath rather than above the target deposit, reassess the mapped sequence. New missions build on Apollo, robotic returns, and orbital surveys by testing specific gaps. The goal is an interpretable addition to the archive, with enough context for another researcher to challenge the conclusion.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: LPI: Schrödinger basin science conceptsHow impact melts, exposed crust, and volcanic products address different questions.
- Read: NASA: lunar impact-history scienceWhy dating particular impact events matters beyond the sampled location.
- Read: LPI: documented lunar samplingPreserving the relationship between a sample and its surroundings.
- Read: NASA: preserving the sample collectionControlled handling and long-term scientific value.