Lesson 4 of 6 · Prototypes and tradeoffs
Build the test that settles the choice
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonCompare design alternatives using explicit criteria and prototypes that address the important uncertainty.
In this lesson 4 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
An alternative is a complete proposition
A compares candidate solutions against agreed criteria. A low-mass instrument might need more observing time; a high-rate radio might need tighter pointing. Compare the relevant system effects rather than choosing a component by its most attractive isolated specification. The preferred option depends on which requirements must be met and which improvements are optional.
Hard constraints should not disappear inside a weighted score. A design that cannot fit the launch is not rescued merely by scoring well on unrelated preferences. First establish feasibility, then compare the remaining alternatives and the uncertainty in their predicted performance.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
A prototype has a question to answer
A can test a mechanism, algorithm, interface or operational concept without reproducing every aspect of the final spacecraft. Its value depends on whether the relevant physical or behavioral features are represented. A lightweight mock-up can reveal access problems while providing little evidence about launch vibration tolerance.
Deep Space 1 was a technology demonstration mission. Its role illustrates why new capabilities benefit from explicit evidence rather than assumptions that a promising design must work in flight. Ground prototypes and flight demonstrations address different parts of the uncertainty.
Read & understand
Test the trade, not the favorite
In a fictional sampler study, option A is lighter but has uncertain performance in crumbly material. Option B is heavier and has better-supported collection performance. A prototype trial using a relevant range of material properties could clarify the trade. Testing only an easy solid block would not address the uncertainty that distinguishes the options.
Define success criteria and measurements before seeing the result. Repeat enough relevant cases to learn about variability, and retain failures. A test designed only to produce an impressive demonstration may leave the key engineering question unanswered.
Test the uncertainty that could change the choice
Original teaching diagram. Fictional sample-collection trade study. OPTION A. Lower mass. Uncertain collection in. crumbly material. OPTION B. Higher mass. Better-supported. collection performance. A relevant material trial informs this trade; an easy demonstration may leave it unresolved.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Test the uncertainty that could change the choiceCheck 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Revisit the ranking when assumptions move
Suppose a weighted comparison favors option A only when its predicted power is low. If that estimate is uncertain, examine whether a plausible higher value changes the ranking. This sensitivity check identifies where more evidence could matter to the decision.
A trade study is not a permanent verdict independent of its assumptions. Record criteria, weights, constraints, estimates and why an option was selected. When new evidence arrives, the team can revisit the choice without pretending that the earlier result established more than it did.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.