Lesson 3 of 4 · A hurricane seen through radar
A hurricane seen through radar
5 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonExplain how a radar-derived wind map differs from a photograph.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Follow a linked name to explore its archive card. “Back to your lesson” brings you to the same part of the reading.
Read & understand
A dated observation case
NOAA documented RADARSAT-2 observations of Hurricane Marie in October 2020. The illustrated product uses radar measurements to investigate winds over the ocean. The archive card Radarsat-2 provides context about the spacecraft responsible for the observations.
The colors in the preserved image are a scientific display of a derived quantity. They are not the colors that an astronaut would see while looking at the ocean. Reading the legend is part of reading the result.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
From rough water to an estimate
Wind affects the ocean surface, and the surface affects radar backscatter. A retrieval method connects those measurements with an estimate of wind conditions. That connection depends on the method and its valid range; the sensor does not directly photograph a number written on the water.
A validation exercise might compare the product with an independent observation close in time and location. Differences could come from uncertainty, differing sampling scales or a changing storm. Investigating those possibilities is more useful than assuming one colorful map is automatically exact.
NOAA's RADARSAT-2 radar-derived wind-speed imagery follows Hurricane Marie from October 1 to October 3, 2020. Display image resized and compressed.
Look closely
What tells you that these colors encode a measurement product?
See what to notice
The legend and units describe a derived variable. They should be read with the acquisition date and retrieval method.
Check 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
A moving event needs timestamps
A storm changes as it moves. Combining scenes acquired hours apart without preserving their times can create a misleading impression of one simultaneous state. A report should distinguish acquisition time from download time and publication time.
In a classroom example, an observation acquired at 09:00 reaches an analyst at 11:30. Its delivery latency is two and a half hours. Faster delivery would improve timeliness, but would not retroactively change the scene’s acquisition time or remove retrieval uncertainty.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.