Lesson 2 of 6 · Uncertainty and error bars
Ask what an error bar means
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonDistinguish data spread, uncertainty in an estimate and a defined interval.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
The symbol does not define the quantity
An error bar can show , a , a confidence interval or another stated range. These represent different things. A chart must define the bars before the viewer can interpret their size or compare them across studies. The same-looking marks need not have the same statistical meaning.
A set of repeated measurements can vary substantially while its estimated mean is more precise. Conversely, highly repeatable measurements can share a calibration offset. Small scatter therefore does not automatically establish accuracy relative to the intended physical quantity.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Use the square-root relationship carefully
Under an ideal model of independent observations with a fixed standard deviation of 4 units, the standard deviation of their sample mean is 4 divided by the square root of the sample count. For 16 observations it is 1 unit; for 64 it is 0.5 unit. Four times the observations halves this component of uncertainty.
These fictional values illustrate a statistical model, not a universal rule for all data. Correlated samples, changing conditions and systematic effects can invalidate a simple application. Repeating the same biased procedure does not guarantee convergence to the right physical answer.
More readings help under stated assumptions
Original teaching diagram. Fictional fixed spread. Standard deviation: 4. 16 readings: SE = 1. Four times the sample. 64 readings. SE = 0.5. Independent observations and fixed finite spread assumed; shared bias is not removed.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: More readings help under stated assumptionsCheck 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Interpret intervals through their method
A frequentist 95% confidence procedure is designed to cover the fixed parameter in about 95% of repeated uses under its assumptions. It does not mean that 95% of individual observations lie inside a particular interval for the mean. It also does not provide a blanket probability that every part of a scientific explanation is correct.
For a fictional estimate reported as 10 with an interval from 8 to 12, identify the parameter, confidence level, procedure and assumptions. Comparing two sets of bars by eye is not a universal significance test; the correct comparison depends on their definitions and any dependence between the estimates.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: NIST: confidence intervalsCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.
- Read: NIST: confidence limits for a meanCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.
- Read: NIST: measurement-process characterizationCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.