Lesson 1 of 6 · Opportunity costs
Compare what a choice makes possible and gives up
8 minute lesson · 3 checks along the way
Your goal for this lessonApply opportunity cost without treating every benefit as interchangeable or every past expense as a reason to continue.
In this lesson 3 sections · 3 checks
Using archive links & definitions
Words with a dotted underline open a short definition right here in the lesson.
Read & understand
A limited resource has alternative uses
Choosing a space project uses resources that could support another activity. is the value of the best forgone alternative, not the sum of every imaginable alternative. The comparison can involve funding, skilled labor, launch capacity, observing time or management attention. A project can have worthwhile benefits and still involve a real tradeoff.
Imagine a fictional instrument team with one available test week. It can complete a new calibration study or investigate a reliability concern, but cannot fully do both in that interval. The opportunity cost of choosing calibration includes the value of the best alternative use of that week, not merely the laboratory’s cash invoice.
Check 1 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Compare options that are actually feasible
A fair comparison specifies the resource constraint, the objective and the alternatives. “Do everything” is not a usable option if the team lacks the people or time. Nor is an unrelated proposal a meaningful substitute unless the resources can actually be redirected to it.
For a fictional public budget, compare an additional weather instrument with an alternative that uses the same available allocation. Consider expected benefits, uncertainty, timing and who receives them. A numerical score can organize assumptions, but the weights express choices about priorities and should be visible to the people reviewing the decision.
Make the alternative explicit
Original teaching diagram. Define the choice. Objective and resource constraint. Best feasible forgone alternative. Assess the next step. Future costs, benefits and risks. What existing work makes possible. Sunk spending cannot be recovered by continuing; real future transition costs still belong in the comparison.
Open full-size diagram in a new tab: Make the alternative explicitCheck 2 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Read & understand
Past spending is evidence, not an automatic command
Money already spent cannot be recovered simply by continuing a project. The decision about the next step should compare future costs, benefits and risks, including any real cancellation costs or preserved capabilities. Past work can affect those future options without making continuation automatically correct.
A balanced explanation can conclude that continuing is justified, that redesign is preferable or that stopping is warranted. The reasoning should identify the alternatives and evidence rather than rely solely on pride, sunk expense or the claim that a space activity is inherently either priceless or wasteful.
Check 3 of 3
10 pointsUse the reading above. You can try again without losing points.
Put it together
Your lesson progress
Each check connects to a part of the story. Complete all 3 to earn your 25-point lesson bonus.
Explore further · Optional
Go to the source
Explore the evidence behind this lesson. These optional readings and videos open in a new tab.
- Read: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: opportunity costCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.
- Read: GAO: cost estimating and assessment guideCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.
- Read: NASA: program and project life cycleCompare the explanation and its assumptions with the worked example in this lesson.